[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:55:17 -0700
From: Tim <tim-security@...tinelchicken.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Shellshock and beyond
> While it is too late for our hardware etc. perhaps strong type systems such as
> found in Haskell can help here? It is known to be very good at avoiding
> undefined or unexpected runtime behavior. Too late also for current languages
> to have this bolted on but if anyone wanted to write "secure" software I'd be
> looking at languages which provide some more guarantees. Too late for bash
> also, of course which I suppose points us back at the original problem.
I agree significant security benefit can be gained from these kinds of
approaches. The trick is, convincing people to use such a language.
Things like JavaScript and PHP are wildly popular because they are so
easy to get started with. Minimal learning curve counts for a lot.
That, and rapid development of new functionality is king in business.
How can strongly typed functional language compete?
tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
