Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:42:28 -0500
From: "Kobrin, Eric" <ekobrin@...mai.com>
To: "oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
CC: "chet.ramey@...e.edu" <chet.ramey@...e.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through
 bash (3rd vulnerability)

On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@...e.edu> wrote:
> If that is the command you ran, this doesn't show any vulnerability. 

I've seen quite a few examples like this which don't do precisely what the submitter thought.

I hope this isn't another such example:

$ env $'BASH_FUNC_\nfoo%%=() { echo 123\n }' ./bash -c 'foo'
./bash: error importing function definition for `
foo'
123

This doesn't seem like desired behavior.

In the version before the recent patches, adding unexpected characters could cause segfaults.

-- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.