Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 04:44:05 +0400
From: Solar Designer <>
Cc: Chester Ramey <>
Subject: binary-patching bash


I've just tweeted some crazy stuff, and it is even crazier to talk about
this on a mailing list focused on Open Source, but ...

<solardiz> cp -ip bash{,~} && env - perl -pe 's/\((\) {\0)/\0\1/g' bash > bash~ && test `cmp -l bash{,~} | wc -l` = 1 && ln bash{,-} && mv -v bash{~,}
<solardiz> Previous tweet disables function imports in bash due to strncmp(..., 4). Tested on some Linux & FreeBSD, from bash & csh. At your own risk.
<solardiz> perl -pe 's/\(\) {\0/(){\0\0/g' followed by an "exactly one match" check may be safer e.g. for an Internet-wide scan^Wpatch. ;-) #shellshock
<solardiz> bash 1.14.7 and bash 4.3 (and all inbetween?) use STREQN ("() {", string, 4) and define STREQN via strncmp(). Allows portable binary patch.

The idea is that the length 4 STREQN() aka !strncmp() when invoked on a
shorter constant string will require that the entire env var value be
that string - that is, either empty (in my first tweet above) or a
3-char string (in my third tweet above).  Neither case leaves any room
for an attacker to provide arbitrary input to the parser via the former
function imports feature.

This dirty hack may be handy for patching otherwise unmaintained systems.

The primary risk I see here is that some build of bash might include
custom patches where this check had been changed to use something other
than (an equivalent of) strncmp().  I am not aware of any such cases.

Here's how to test that the feature is indeed disabled (or at least
broken, although that is an insufficient test for security).  Before the
binary patch:

$ testfunc() { echo test; }
$ export -f testfunc
$ bash -c testfunc

After the binary patch (first tweet):

$ testfunc() { echo test; }
$ export -f testfunc
$ bash -c testfunc
bash: testfunc: command not found


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.