Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:20:23 +0530
From: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala <huzaifas@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE-2014-6271: remote code execution through bash

On 09/25/2014 07:35 AM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 07:07 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 9/24/14, 9:30 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 06:26:53PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@...e.edu> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/24/14, 5:32 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:27:09PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
>>>>>>> Tavis Ormandy just tweetet this:
>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/taviso/status/514887394294652929
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The bash patch seems incomplete to me, function parsing is still
>>>>>>> brittle. e.g. $ env X='() { (a)=>\' sh -c "echo date"; cat echo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for bringing this to oss-security.  I've added CC to Chet and
>>>>>> Tavis on this "reply".
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a fix for this.
>>>>
>>>> Can you provide a pointer to the patch?  I put together a patch that
>>>> changed the report_error() to fatal_error() as I wasn't able to see
>>>> how to reset the parser state.  Was just about to send it out...
>>>
>>> I think Chet is not on oss-security - we should be CC'ing him where
>>> appropriate.  (I've added the CC on this reply.)
>>
>> I haven't sent the patch out.  It's not related to this problem -- this
>> is just the easiest way to get to that code path -- and I still have
>> some investigating to do.
>>
> 
> Please note, We have assigned CVE-2014-3659 to this issue.
> 
> 

I got this message from MITRE some time back:

"No, we are keeping CVE-2014-7169. CVE-2014-7169 was already public at
nvd.nist.gov before 1146319 was created. Also, the nvd.nist.gov entry
most likely has a much wider audience. We will enter a REJECT entry
for CVE-2014-3659."

So CVE-2014-3659 stands rejected and we will use CVE-2014-7169 for this
issue.

-- 
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala / Red Hat Product Security Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.