Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:30:24 +0000
From: Xen.org security team <security@....org>
To: xen-announce@...ts.xen.org, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
 xen-users@...ts.xen.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Xen.org security team <security@....org>
Subject: Xen Security Advisory 106 (CVE-2014-7156) - Missing privilege
 level checks in x86 emulation of software interrupts

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

            Xen Security Advisory CVE-2014-7156 / XSA-106
                              version 3

    Missing privilege level checks in x86 emulation of software interrupts

UPDATES IN VERSION 3
====================

This issue has been assigned CVE-2014-7156.

ISSUE DESCRIPTION
=================

The emulation of instructions which generate software interrupts fails
to perform supervisor mode permission checks.

However these instructions are not usually handled by the emulator.
Exceptions to this are
- - when a memory operand (implicit for the affected instructions) lives
  in (emulated or passed through) memory mapped IO space,
- - in the case of guests running in 32-bit PAE mode, when such an
  instruction is (in execution flow) within four instructions of one
  doing a page table update,
- - when an Invalid Opcode exception gets raised by a guest instruction,
  and the guest then (likely maliciously) alters the instruction to
  become one of the affected ones,
- - when the guest is in real mode (in which case there are no privilege
  checks anyway).

IMPACT
======

Malicious HVM guest user mode code may be able to crash the guest.

VULNERABLE SYSTEMS
==================

Xen versions from 3.3 onwards are vulnerable.

Only user processes in HVM guests can take advantage of this
vulnerability.

MITIGATION
==========

Running only PV guests will avoid this issue.

There is no mitigation available for HVM guests.

CREDITS
=======

This issue was discovered Andrei Lutas at BitDefender and analyzed by
Andrew Cooper at Citrix.

RESOLUTION
==========

Applying the attached patch resolves this issue.

xsa106.patch        xen-unstable, Xen 4.4.x, Xen 4.3.x, Xen 4.2.x

$ sha256sum xsa106*.patch
301060f801ab39c15ac773e1bcc250f0e6bf30d748007a96173459b83afc9270  xsa106.patch
$
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUIpznAAoJEIP+FMlX6CvZNzsH/2EiupxpKxmHXoWxZAqlDz5E
+cdmv5axHGO74bU8xGe/WFcfOCjx8LaPifWd/g6AMlSa7BHe1i1sPmOifr6jhRlz
xfJonBcXl6/Z7LpfaYdu2M+6mDXoO2Ov5yKEYDNPyzwfmRH+bLBBGrGTzJvyaEj2
PS2JgtIzIVRFHdmYh7zJeS9isKt9+/lKplAIluKUUUhnX1pMUaTV9Ax67MUs7BdJ
SHh37YoMIZAxAkRl80nT7gBdohLUmQJZm3CVFFjk71hSFlvdRJNZuVJnxMyXXBA3
awQlxUAhUQmP8ls1JTK0EMVe9EAPvyqgPlk/2Ch8UBtpg0MeGzBs9UJwjYeP47Y=
=c9bK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Download attachment "xsa106.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (922 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.