Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:56:06 +0200
From: Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Enigmail warning

1) Kindly have a look at the License(s)
2) I also can't reproduce your issue with the level of details that
you're providing. (Some extensions can cause conflicts with Enigmail,
preventing it from succesfully signing/encrypting outgoing mail. #FAQ)
I'm assuming that you're not trying to mix S/MIME and PGP/MIME in the
same message.

2014-08-18 8:22 GMT+02:00 Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi>:
> Please read: http://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/forum/support/thread/3e7268a4/
>
> Quote from thread below:
>
> Enigmail 1.7 is completely broken for my purposes.
>
> Steps to reproduce the problem:
>
> 1) Write an email in TB.
> 2) Ensure "Force encryption" in Enigmail.
> 3) Ensure "Force signing" in Enigmail.
> 4) Recheck encryption and signing settings... OK.
> 5) Send the email.
> 6) Look at the received email. OOPS. It is NOT signed and NOT encrypted.
>
> Sorry to say this so directly, but an encryption system, which CONFIRMS
> to the user in it's graphical user interface on two different places
> that it will encrypt AND THEN SENDS THE EMAIL WITHOUT ANY ENCRYPTION IN
> PLAIN TEXT ... is just the BIGGEST IMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE.
>
> Sorry for my profane language but there is simply no excuse for such
> bullshit.
>
> I am currently preparing a crypto class for journalists next week to
> teach them how to use safe email.
>
> HOW am I going to explain that? A system tells the user in a separate
> window as well as in a menu line that everything will be encrypted but
> then it simply FORGOT to ENCRYPT and, ooops, their report will be
> intercepted and their source will be tortured ?
>
> Ok...let's see....maybe there is some magic incompatibility with the TB
> or OS version or the specific configuration I used or whatever... As a
> computer scientist I can imagine many bug-explanations.
>
> Good that I am just a computer scientist. As a serious user (dissident,
> whistle-blower, diplomatic or military user) I would now be waiting for
> the bad guys come and get me with their water-board.
>
> Still as a computer scientist I need an answer to which system I will
> teach in my class next week. Command-line PGP ?!?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.