Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:26:32 +0900
From: "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <>
Cc:, security <>,
Subject: Re: possible CVE-2010 request: Ruby older than 1.9.2 appending
 current directory to the load path

I guess the change (committed r23816 in our svn repository,) is not a
security issue (just a hardening).

so I think it shouldn't need CVE ID.

Thoughts? >

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Murray McAllister <> wrote:
> Good morning,
> CVE-2014-3248 (
> describes the following:
> "On platforms with Ruby 1.9.1 or earlier, an attacker could have Puppet
> execute malicious code by convincing a privileged user to change
> directories to one containing the malicious code and then run Puppet."
> The issue in Ruby was fixed here:
> The "$: doesn't include the current direcotry." entry, I guess.
> Is a 2010 CVE ID needed for this, or should it only be treated as hardening?
> Thanks,
> --
> Murray McAllister / Red Hat Product Security

Shota Fukumori a.k.a. @sora_h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.