Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:37:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux kernel futex local privilege escalation
 (CVE-2014-3153)

On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Solar Designer wrote:

> I've added CC to Thomas.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:38:27PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:45:45PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > I've attached patches by Thomas Gleixner (four e-mails, in mbox format),
> > > as well as back-ports of those by John Johansen of Canonical, who wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't find any statement of what
> > version these patches are intended to apply cleanly to. They don't
> > apply to latest stable.
> 
> Thomas - can you answer Rich's question?  This is about patches you sent
> on June 3 to linux-distros, which Kees then saved into an mbox file.

They should apply cleanly, if all stable tagged futex patches before
that are applied.

Thanks,

	Thomas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.