[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:39:45 +0000
From: mancha <mancha1@...o.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: nmav@...tls.org
Subject: Re: GnuTLS and libtasn1 security fixes
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 09:40:18PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 10:31 AM, Tomas Hoger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > New GnuTLS and libtasn1 versions fix few issues you might be
> > interested to look at:
>
> Thanks Thomas.
>
> Based on your research of this issue can you comment anything on
> whether CVE-2014-3466 affects the 2.x series as well? It seems like at
> least CVE-2014-3465 is 3.x series only.
Hello.
I believe you're right about CVE-2014-3465 not being applicable in
GnuTLS 2.x because in that branch the result of
gnutls_x509_oid2ldap_string is checked for NULL returns.
As for the rest, I've backported the fixes to GnuTLS 2.12.23 (the
CVE-2014-3467,3468,3469 fixes apply to the embedded libtasn1).
You're welcome to them:
http://sf.net/projects/mancha/files/sec/gnutls-2.12.23_CVE-2014-3466.diff
http://sf.net/projects/mancha/files/sec/gnutls-2.12.23_CVE-2014-3467.diff
http://sf.net/projects/mancha/files/sec/gnutls-2.12.23_CVE-2014-3468.diff
http://sf.net/projects/mancha/files/sec/gnutls-2.12.23_CVE-2014-3469.diff
Note: Add ".sig" to above URLs for the PGP signatures.
--mancha
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
