Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:18:16 -0400 (EDT) From: cve-assign@...re.org To: abn@...hat.com Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE Split: CVE-2014-0050 Apache Commons FileUpload and Apache Tomcat DoS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Although Commons FileUpload and Tomcat are affected by this flaw and > the vulnerable classes share the same ancestry, the code bases for > them have been maintained in separate source trees for a long while > now. > > Can this CVE be split? The existence of separate source trees does not affect the number of CVE IDs. > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Feb/41 "Apache Tomcat 7 and Apache Tomcat 8 use a packaged renamed copy of Apache Commons FileUpload" in that reference is sufficient for us to use only one CVE ID. We do not rely on factors such as whether the code has become non-identical or whether different persons are maintaining the two copies of the code. - -- CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority M/S M300 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA [ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTNcoqAAoJEKllVAevmvmsSDMH/3G6KpgE8KkqoeA0G90Dussz EEwfBy1qxm7s6DMZNn+gmHi2v0cvH6WzbHAcMc01X8noQsFYMkK93ir7Gp1PMFSN 5AdepR+RedtZKKYKOmjCvkOYG0LFH+lUDn+jcsPuqcFZ4zi8jVAP4Q2RHXTpg9VI xm+gDGkKi3LegOygKkjVnXsr6PHxz7Z7Pzd27KhrK+Qk3wQmTkvAqotXTRJzXFj4 eC6tfwUHoTCO0QZ24RYk+oJaOmk1WlWtLZnsIlzB7rba8Vsb18f0LlT3Eqozz+ha t5q2veIYA/CDawuPzcvAfSXbqfVtws9HgXs+pJti7CNi4+LQnxCvhbu2mKqhsNQ= =mlQ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.