Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:07:23 -0700
From: "Vincent Danen" <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE assignment for jinja2

On 01/11/2014, at 13:58 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

> Hi Vicnent,
>
> Disclaimer: to be taken with some caution.
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 01:37:51PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote:
>> On 01/10/2014, at 22:34 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>>
>>> https://github.com/mitsuhiko/jinja2/commit/acb672b6a179567632e032f547582f30fa2f4aa7
>>>
>>> dirname = '_jinja2-cache-%d' % os.getuid()
>>>
>>> Arun Babu Neelicattu of Red Hat spotted this commit which introduces a
>>> temporary file creation vulnerability. This issue has been assigned
>>> CVE-2014-0012. For information on how to safely create temporary files
>>> please see
>>> http://kurt.seifried.org/2012/03/14/creating-temporary-files-securely/
>>>
>>> For Python simply use ?mkstemp? for files and ?mkdtemp? for
>>> directories from the ?tempfile? module.
>>
>> MITRE assigned CVE-2014-1402 to this yesterday:
>>
>> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/71 (the report, the followup has the CVE assignment).
>>
>> That means you'll need to reject this assignment; the commit that Arun spotted was due to the Debian bug report (which the git commit notes, and Ratul linked to in his initial CVE request to the list).
>
> Aren't the two CVE assignments correct this way as the second
> temporary file creation vulnerability was introduced by the mentioned
> commit?
>
> Initially there was assigned CVE-2014-1402 for:
>
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/71
>
> wich is also http://bugs.debian.org/734747 and was attempted to be
> fixed with commit
> https://github.com/mitsuhiko/jinja2/commit/acb672b6a179567632e032f547582f30fa2f4aa7
>
> But the above commit introduces a new temporary file creation
> vulnerability, which then got CVE-2014-0012 assigned by Kurt.

Yes, all correct.  Which is why I apologized in a subsequent email about the confusion.  =)

-- 
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (711 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.