Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 12:09:24 +0530 (IST)
From: P J P <>
To: oss security list <>
Subject: Re: CVE request: Linux kernel: net: memory leak in
 recvmsg handler msg_name & msg_namelen logic


+-- On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Marcus Meissner wrote --+
| CVE-2013-6405 covers parts of that already I think and could be extended?

So, do we use the same CVE for this issue too? Or does it qualify for a 
separate one?? (just checking) I think a separate CVE would be good, but not 
sure how such cases are handled previously.

Thank you.
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.