[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:29:34 +0200
From: Rafael Luque <rafael.luque.leiva@...il.com>
To: kseifried@...hat.com
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: Javamelody blind XSS through
X-Forwarded-For header
The issue has already been fixed in the trunk (revision 3515):
http://code.google.com/p/javamelody/source/detail?r=3515
It's ready for the next release (1.47) and a new build including the fix
it's available at:
https://javamelody.googlecode.com/files/javamelody-20130927.jar
The release 1.47, including that fix, is supposed to be released in just a
few days from now.
Rafa
2013/9/27 Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/26/2013 12:01 PM, Rafael Luque wrote:
> > Javamelody [1] includes a blind XSS vulnerability. An attacker
> > could provide an specially-crafted "X-Forwarded-For" HTTP header
> > while visiting a Java web application monitored with Javamelody
> > that would lead to arbitrary HTML or Javascript execution in the
> > context of the administrator user monitoring the panel of active
> > sessions in the application.
> >
> > The versions affected are the last one 1.46 and all the previous
> > that include the session monitoring panel feature.
> >
> > The issue has been reported to the project [2] but whithout
> > response by now.
> >
> > The proof of concept may use the own Javamelody online demo:
> >
> > 1. Access the demo site [3] using a fake X-Forwarded-For header
> > like the following: <script>alert('xss')</script> 2. Then visit the
> > Javamelody sessions monitoring page at [4] and you should see the
> > Javascript running.
> >
> > Can you allocate a CVE identifier for this?
> >
> > Thank you && Regards,
> >
> > Rafael Luque
> >
> > [1] https://code.google.com/p/javamelody/ [2]
> > https://code.google.com/p/javamelody/issues/detail?id=346 [3]
> > http://demo.javamelody.cloudbees.net/ [4]
> > http://demo.javamelody.cloudbees.net/monitoring?part=sessions
> >
>
> Please use CVE-2013-4378 for this issue.
>
> - --
> Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
> PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSRSIPAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTESUP/03uh70VX0qS3yLBakwMFrpB
> zUKnQElyqJzMh7N7Q0wBUk+eJPB5scJYqMeoi7HnCgyQPeuk0NGk3cmQT/DP/uXo
> fs1ajYEX4KJS4ydKAdytvj1qI9aJdJF6cLoIf0ri7ZHtcbaFnFclYeaTXf9269L9
> R1qJaM5+d3if8a3FGOXQbhDTFiY7ohzDzl/OsRybHTll8Z4UxaC+IlMgbMkDscHU
> VVqQ6y0w7vqTyeG4vNhuE+XEeUmZxKdxNUQTsMqOhYGi4AS+unm553aQ+DAMeD9y
> MODbkdAolh2CJkZsWdI8tfLQmWkRZ0FP8L5TQXkcu+EeE8aFdtlxoWPVU4PTXAak
> LXCuMNQEG5ig/MNdYkNwTudBgRCUYKi50ek3XSf4tkovyNP+L9Lw3t/+5/EWpWg3
> Y58hpzOKpL8ieRlrIFzW8rxOV0xFitn+aontZKuwxFv6wa+Av/Ku9eUvEZlkYmx1
> LKzERCCz2V9dtjn0W/zpWf8Mg3A+KqST+7M22M0m9G4OwmIFwyWifs9TvigDwg/r
> X4QbiJ9G8eWCk2Lpw1DNFVPoamIPoynYfRcOfQeC/P81QqeAyJ9yeejeIosR5TDc
> 9yP2VPJJZ7ufGMqwy/u8k/3VkKNSMQykX03u/t7GpyriZnw4DNvjd/PTynNvZMsL
> IfKZCYKOkAqx7SqL+tD6
> =Id6a
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
