Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:05:48 +0200 From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: X.509 name constraints and potential interpretation conflict NSS CA roots are widely reused, but the implementation deviates from RFC 5280 in such a way that NSS can safely accept additional root certificates as long as they have name constraints. I think this is a bug in RFC 5280, and the fix in NSS is sound, but it could still result in surprising behavior if the root store is used unfiltered with TLS implementations that lack this bug fix. For reference, here is the RFC 5280 errata I submitted: -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> Section: 126.96.36.199 Original Text ------------- DNS name restrictions are expressed as host.example.com. Any DNS name that can be constructed by simply adding zero or more labels to the left-hand side of the name satisfies the name constraint. For example, www.host.example.com would satisfy the constraint but host1.example.com would not. Corrected Text -------------- [Add this to the paragraph] If an implementation extracts DNS names from the subject distinguished name, DNS name restrictions MUST be applied to these names as well. Notes ----- When used with TLS and HTTP (according to RFC 2818), section 188.8.131.52, Name Constraints, is technically a NOP that doesn't constraint the CA that has this attribute because RFC 2818 mandates processing of the common name attribute in the subject distinguished name. Consequentially, the constraint can be bypassed by issuing a certificate without a subject alternative name. The fix is to apply the DNS name restrictions to the relevant parts of the subject distinguished name, too, as implemented here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394919 -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.