Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:50:12 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: kernel: tmpfs use-after-free

Hey all,

While everyone's going wild hndl->dump'ing with CVE-2013-1763, there's
apparently been another silent security fix with
5f00110f7273f9ff04ac69a5f85bb535a4fd0987 [1]:

> tmpfs: fix use-after-free of mempolicy object
>
> The tmpfs remount logic preserves filesystem mempolicy if the mpol=M
> option is not specified in the remount request.  A new policy can be
> specified if mpol=M is given.
>
> Before this patch remounting an mpol bound tmpfs without specifying
> mpol= mount option in the remount request would set the filesystem's
> mempolicy object to a freed mempolicy object.
>
> How far back does this issue go? I see it in both 2.6.36 and 3.3.  I did
> not look back further.


The commit message goes on with details on how to trigger it. Note
that as of 5eaf563e53294d6696e651466697eb9d491f3946 [2], you can now
mount filesystems as an unprivileged user after a call to
unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNS), or a similar clone(2) call. This
means all those random random filesystem bugs you have laying around
in the junk bin are now quite useful. ++tricks;

Cheers,
Jason


[1] http://git.zx2c4.com/linux/commit/?id=5f00110f7273f9ff04ac69a5f85bb535a4fd0987
[2] http://git.zx2c4.com/linux/commit/?id=5eaf563e53294d6696e651466697eb9d491f3946

--
Jason A. Donenfeld
www.zx2c4.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.