Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:37:59 +0100 From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kargig@...d.gr Subject: Re: Linux kernel handling of IPv6 temporary addresses Kurt Seifried wrote: > [...] > Sounds like this needs a CVE, is it correct that: an attacker can > create a bunch of RA prefixes thus filling up the # of allowed IPv6 > addresses for an interface, preventing any more IPv6 addresses from > being assigned to that interface? In other words an attack over the > local network resulting in a DoS condition. Well, an attacker that is allowed to send RA's could do all kinds of ugly things, just like a rogue DHCP server could. Since that kind of address configuration provides no means to verify authenticity, hosts have no way to tell whether an RA is correct or malicious. Security basically relies on the switches blocking unintended address configuration. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.