Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:11:28 -0600 From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com CC: Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@...ian.org> Subject: Re: CVE-request: Roundcube XSS issues -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/20/2012 05:24 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote: > Hi Jon, > > this is due the recent roundcubemail XSS issues post:  > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/20/2 > > which detailed leads into: 1, issue #1 New larry skin & literal in > Subject header display Ticket: > http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1488519 Upstream patch: > http://trac.roundcube.net/changeset/a7d5e3e8580466639a18da35af13b97dc3765c16/github > > Upon code review, I don't think this issue affects 0.7.x versions, > we ship in Fedora and EPEL (iilc the Larry skin was introduced > only in 0.8.x version and in 0.7.x version the related code looks > different). I don't have filed RH bug for this based on the above. > Could you have a look and confirm this? Please use CVE-2012-3507 for this issue. > 2, Issue 2a: Description: Stored XSS in e-mail body. Ticket: > http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1488613 Upstream patch: > https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/5ef8e4ad9d3ee8689d2b83750aa65395b7cd59ee > > Upon code review doesn't seem to affect rcmail we ship in Fedora / > EPEL -> haven't filed RH bug for it. Could you double-check and > confirm that?, > > Issue 2b: Self XSS in e-mail body (Signature). Ticket: > http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1488613 Upstream patch: > https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/c086978f6a91eacb339fd2976202fca9dad2ef32 > > The 'program/js/app.js' rcube_webmail() upstream change from the > patch above seems to be applicable to Fedora / EPEL rcmail > versions. Thus I have filed: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849615 > > to track this. But not sure whole 'Self XSS in e-mail body > (Signature).' upstream patch would apply with its logic to 0.7.x > versions: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849615#c3 > > Therefore this needs review by someone more familiar with > rcube_webmail() routine code to decide if apply that patch or not. > Could you do that? Please use CVE-2012-3508 for these two issues (same version, same type of vuln so cve merge). > Thank you && Regards, Jan. -- Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat > Security Response Team - -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQMmGwAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmT1xcQAIuQQwlBfIJjQipIjUrdT35Q zvKke9+QkCv/jvSjHRBdOiOAE1616Y2RhKE4QLRp0wzu2L20m0xDX/ypehsFtovH 0OVrKX/R72RVxv0chUysxYuwROIAYsqOWyfH/pBx1H7hYiBMn0JarOl/Yl23Ii6P PaTIonCtgv8Cg+eHuumoBS6O6tCosazPxRD7NE40RWc88Wydr6gGYVDgYP3Glt0D RoOu1vmb+sDo1Vba1vqim/f6Kyv1CP4TPV/Z8aeZiW5EdyXW5Jx6fm37cXV7/Kde pJToiFw6jPHrY7h74yStVOAxZ6yXhBLUwVzqQ+wio13XOEtiSvhIY13pdOi1nFdE mk0IgH8dmM/7muTIBF4Hw8BnR8i5SpCus5J1gxW6L4Wb03Xz4yPnrmRw9LV54VKu dG2RLAtHEx2dd0jIRQLarCndg+GEWfk7ldM7ijxzb0tYgdatl07T7MJmic0V1Y4g wKrm6z8RVsvQjZCtcYG0hFBcUeJsWaw5Ta+iyhHk66uIQf8Rq7hpp9I1PanWujSn Uo217JPcR3QdXjRQ7QPgFBdnkwbF6qr6Vw7WC0s1jBIW6LtdBx5CyOWQUppnebNk QUEbXV051D+t09a9bBRyqR3N5dbK1gsx9RBSa8qizL4P+ibd8fip6yUOzC0/ATYx fcYldh0Vgu6ghLMIEEDZ =wELK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.