Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:36:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...-smtp.mitre.org> To: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> cc: Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi>, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Greg Knaddison <greg.knaddison@...uia.com>, "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...-smtp.mitre.org> Subject: Re: CVE Request for Drupal contributed modules All, I have several clarifications and corrections to this latest Drupal request and CVE response, on top of the dupes already listed. The most important notes are listed first. (Greg and Kurt, the number of duplicates and unassigned CVEs in this batch is understandable due to various factors such as amount and assignments from mutiple sources, but it's disconcerting. Maybe we should talk off-list and figure out how to minimize these problems in the future.) >CVE-2012-2709 SA-CONTRIB-2012-081 - Aberdeen - Cross Site Scripting This is a duplicate that might look like a typo at first. Around May 21, MITRE originally published CVE-2012-2907 (NOTE THE DIFFERENT NUMBER STARTING WITH "29" INSTEAD OF "27"). CVE-2012-2907 is in more active use, so keep CVE-2012-2907. We will REJECT CVE-2012-2709. (Kurt, CVE-2012-2709 belongs to you. If you actually intended to list the already-published CVE-2012-2907 and made a typo to CVE-2012-2709, please make sure you've removed CVE-2012-2709 from your pool.) > CVE-2012-2713 SA-CONTRIB-2012-085 - BrowserID - Multiple > Vulnerabilities - CSRF > CVE-2012-2714 SA-CONTRIB-2012-085 - BrowserID - Multiple > Vulnerabilities - BrowserID login theft The description in SA-CONTRIB-2012-085 is not clear, but it seems that CVE-2012-2714 might be the natural consequence of exploiting the CSRF. The title "multiple vulnerabilities" does not help. Any thoughts on this one? >CVE-2012-2727 SA-CONTRIB-2012-098 - Janrain Capture - Open Redirect SA-CONTRIB-2012-098 mentioned a second separate issue for "An additional security weakness occurs when the module creates a new local user account." CVE-2012-2727 - open redirect (new) CVE-2012-3798 - disclosure of portions of passwords > CVE-2012-2723 SA-CONTRIB-2012-094 A close reading of SA-CONTRIB-2012-094 suggests that there should be two CVEs. Part of the advisory does seem to imply that the XSS is resultant from the CSRF; but it also says "This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must have a role with the maestro admin permissions," which implies that users with maestro admin permissions should not be allowed to conduct XSS attacks themselves. This could probably be argued either way. CVE-2012-2723 - XSS (new) CVE-2012-3799 - CSRF > CVE-2012-2721 SA-CONTRIB-2012-092 - Organic Groups - Cross Site > Scripting (XSS) and Access Bypass This is 2 types of issues, thus needs 2 CVEs. CVE-2012-2721 - Access Bypass (new) CVE-2012-3800 - XSS > CVE-2012-2706 SA-CONTRIB-2012-079 - Post Affiliate Pro - Cross Site > Scripting (XSS) and Access Bypass - Unsupported Two vuln types, two CVEs needed. CVE-2012-2706 - XSS (new) CVE-2012-3802 - unspecified read of commisions - Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.