[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:22:32 +0100
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request -- kernel: execshield: predictable ascii armour base address
Hi,
There are also 4 seperate issues in Chris blogpost.
CVEs are sometimes assigned if security preconditions are not met,
or are too weak. (like if you would have a password hashing algorithm
without salt ... while it works per-se, it is too weak)
Ciao, Marcus
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:01:39AM -0700, Nick Kralevich wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why this is worthy of a CVE? I can see this as a
> bug of course. But a "vulnerability"?
>
> This bug, by itself, does not cause a vulnerability. It just makes
> vulnerabilities easier to exploit. I'm not sure this is worthy of a CVE
> unless we're willing to assign CVEs to all fixed address allocations.
>
> -- Nick
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 03/20/2012 06:20 PM, Petr Matousek wrote:
> > > When running a binary with a lot of shared libraries, predictable base
> > > address is used for one of the loaded libraries.
> > >
> > > This flaw could be used to bypass ASLR.
> > >
> > > References:
> > >
> > http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2012/03/some-random-observations-on-linux-aslr.html
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804947
> >
> > Use CVE-2012-1568.
> >
> > Eugene
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nick Kralevich | Android Security | nnk@...gle.com | 650.214.4037
--
Working, but not speaking, for the following german company:
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
