Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:30:35 -0400
From: Mark Stanislav <mark.stanislav@...il.com>
To: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Requests

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 03/16/2012 09:53 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:20:37AM -0400, Mark Stanislav wrote:
> >> None of the details of these issues have been publicly discussed or
> released as I am trying (without much success) to allocate a CVE prior to
> sending out a coordinated advisory including that identifier as I always
> have done and as the mitre site indicates to do.
> >>
> >> There are no reference links to provide and I am not publicizing
> details on this list before the developer can be informed of the CVE.
> >>
> >> I'm happy to take this off list as I am sure no one cares about any of
> this discussion
>
> In which case you can ask for them on VS@ list where the issue will
> remain embargoed. If the issue is so sensitive you cannot leak
> details/etc then you need to contact Mitre directly (this will also
> ensure no duplicates/etc.).
>

Is "VS@" supposed to be vendor-sec; the defunct list? Or is there another
list I am not aware of? If so, can you please give me the *full* address?
Thanks.


>
> > No, please keep this on the list.  Discussions on how to handle
> > vulnerability disclosure (including the CVE ID assignment step) are
> > definitely on topic for oss-security.
>
> Yes and I need to finish documenting this stuff (it's become obvious we
> need to educate people on how the system works and why it works that
> way, we're not insane, we have good reasons for doing it the way we do,
> honest =).


I'd say you may want to coordinate that documentation with Steve Christy as
the nine times he allocated CVEs for me directly, this sort of conversation
never came up. I can understand frustration on your part that people may
not be educated, but realize that if CNAs handle this process differently,
it may not be a matter of education on how 'the system works' but rather
consistency within the entire process, agnostic of whom is allocating a CVE.

I again, do appreciate your time but I suppose I'll just wait for Steve or
whomever is manning cve@...re to contact me back.

Best,

-Mark



 >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alexander
> > (a moderator for oss-security)
>
>
> --
> Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.