Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:31:10 -0500
From: Andres Gomez <>
To: Kurt Seifried <>,
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <>
Subject: Re: Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189

2012/3/5 Kurt Seifried <>

> Would you consider tham to be the same code base or a different code
> base? If the same code base, share the CVE, if different code bases, new
> CVE for it. Steve: do we have a policy for "Fresh" forks as it were?
Well, Speed Dreams started with TORCS code base, but they have added a lot
new code, so I would say that right now they have different code base,
although they still share a big portion of the code (as the vulnerable
section).  Because of that I would consider It needs a new CVE number,
could you assign one to it?  :)

> Write up the description and send it to Mitre =).
 I already did, I sent details but they have not disclosed them in web page, maybe i used a
wrong email address (

Thank you for your help.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.