Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:48:55 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Cc: tytso@....edu Subject: Re: pwgen: non-uniform distribution of passwords On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:34:12PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > $ ./pwgen -1cn 8 1000000000 | dd obs=10M > 1g ... > $ time ~/john/john-1.7.9-jumbo-5/run/unique -v -mem=25 1gu < 1g > Total lines read 1000000000 Unique lines written 697066573 Here's some further analysis of the 1 billion sample used as a training set along with a separate 1 million sample used as a test set: Applying the 697 million unique passwords (from the 1 billion sample above) as a wordlist (6 GB file size) to crack another 1 million of pwgen'ed passwords cracks 418168 of them (41.8%). For a uniform distribution (which is not the case), this would correspond to total keyspace size of about 1.67 billion passwords (between 30 and 31 bits). Focusing on more frequent pwgen'ed passwords only: The most common passwords in my 1 billion sample happen to be, prefixed by number of occurrences: 127 Ooquoo0e 125 ooghai0E 123 eiThie7e 123 aiShie8o 122 eiQuei9u 122 Aighah4u 121 eichae1I 121 Oophai4o 121 Oochoh5u 121 Iephee6e the next one is seen 120 times. Overall, there are 3452 unique passwords with 100 occurrences or more (in 1 billion generated). Taking these 3452 as a wordlist cracks 284 passwords in the separate 1 million sample. This is 0.0284%. However, 3452 is only %0.0002 of the 1.67 billion estimate for the keyspace size that we arrived at above. Hence, the distribution is non-uniform, and our speedup from exploiting this property is at least 137x on this test. (284 / 2 is obviously 142, but I used more precise numbers here.) Checking this another way, the keyspace size estimate assuming uniform distribution would be only 12 million based on the test above - a lot lower than the previous estimate. This similarly confirms that the distribution is non-uniform. Top 1 million unique passwords from my 1 billion training set cracks 37149 in the test set (3.7%). The corresponding uniform keyspace size estimate is 27 million. Top 10 million unique passwords cracks 145179 (14.5%). The keyspace size estimate is 69 million. Top 100 million unique passwords cracks 262693 (26.3%). The keyspace size estimate is 381 million. Finally, only 115339574 unique passwords are seen in the 1 billion sample more than once. (This is less than 1000-697 = 303 million because many passwords are seen more than 2 times each.) Using them as a wordlist cracks 276382 (27.6%). The keyspace size estimate is 417 million. Chances are that I won't spend further time on this, although a possible project would be to create a program that would output all or top N of pwgen'ed passwords using exact probabilities (based on analysis of pwgen's source code or/and behavior of pwgen with non-random inputs rather than based on normal pwgen invocations like I did so far, which only provides estimates). This would result in more efficient attacks (more passwords in the test set cracked per candidate passwords tested). Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.