Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:30:44 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: CVE request: kernel: Unused iocbs in a batch should not be accounted
 as active

commit 69e4747ee9727d660b88d7e1efe0f4afcb35db1b
Author: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Date:   Sun Jan 8 17:07:28 2012 +0200

    Unused iocbs in a batch should not be accounted as active.

    Since commit 080d676de095 ("aio: allocate kiocbs in batches") iocbs
are allocated in a batch during processing of first iocbs.  All iocbs in
a batch are automatically added to ctx->active_reqs list and accounted
in ctx->reqs_active.

    If one (not the last one) of iocbs submitted by an user fails,
further iocbs are not processed, but they are still present in
ctx->active_reqs and accounted in ctx->reqs_active.  This causes process
to stuck in a D state in wait_for_all_aios() on exit since
ctx->reqs_active will never go down to zero.  Furthermore since
kiocb_batch_free() frees iocb without removing it from active_reqs list
the list become corrupted which may cause oops.

    Fix this by removing iocb from ctx->active_reqs and updating
ctx->reqs_active in kiocb_batch_free().

    Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
    Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
    Cc: stable@...nel.org   # 3.2
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

Issue introduced in v3.2-rc1 via commit 080d676d.

Thanks, Eugene

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.