Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:07:46 +0100
From: Hanno Böck <>
Subject: Re: CVE-request: Serendipity
 'serendipity[filter][bp.ALT]' Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability

Am Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:24:19 -0700
schrieb Kurt Seifried <>:

> My mistake, this should have been merged into CVE-2011-4090, it's the
> same vuln type (XSS) and the same version of Serendipity,
> CVE-2011-4365 is a bad assignment and should be marked as a duplicate
> of CVE-2011-4090.

I'd disagree on that.

CVE-2011-4090 is in an (optional) plugin, while CVE-2011-4365 is an
issue in the main s9y code.

Although the plugin is shipped with the core s9y, the impact is quite
different. For 4090, you only need to care if you do something with the

Hanno Böck		mail/jabber:

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.