Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:18:17 +0100 From: Xen.org security team <security@....org> To: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Xen Security Advisory 4 (CVE-2011-2901) - Xen 3.3 vaddr validation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2011-2901 / XSA-4 revision no.2 Xen <= 3.3 DoS due to incorrect virtual address validation ISSUE DESCRIPTION ================= The x86_64 __addr_ok() macro intends to ensure that the checked address is either in the positive half of the 48-bit virtual address space, or above the Xen-reserved area. However, the current shift count is off-by-one, allowing full access to the "negative half" too, via certain hypercalls which ignore virtual-address bits [63:48]. Vulnerable hypercalls exist only in very old versions of the hypervisor. VULNERABLE SYSTEMS ================== All systems running a Xen 3.3 or earlier hypervisor with 64-bit PV guests with untrusted administrators are vulnerable. IMPACT ====== A malicious guest administrator on a vulnerable system is able to crash the host. There are no known further exploits but these have not been ruled out. RESOLUTION ========== The attached patch resolves the issue. Alternatively, users may choose to upgrade to a more recent hypervisor PATCHES ======= The following patch resolves this issue. Filename: fix-__addr_ok-limit.patch SHA1: f18bde8d276110451c608a16f577865aa1226b4f SHA256: 2da5aac72e1ac4849c34d38374ae456795905fd9512eef94b48fc31383c21636 This patch should apply cleanly, and fix the problem, for all affected versions of Xen. It is harmless when applied to later hypervisors and will be included in the Xen unstable branch in due course. VERSION HISTORY =============== Analysis following version 1 of this advisory (sent out to the predisclosure list during the embargo period) indicates that the actual DoS vulnerability only exists in very old hypervisors, Xen 3.3 and earlier, contrary to previous reports. This advisory is no longer embargoed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOYLq2AAoJEIP+FMlX6CvZLegH/26/oJBkd/WM/yYhXkzlbnIP MxF6Fgy96Omu8poQTanD7g1vEcM0TOLY+Kk3GGsfj4aDdEJ5Nq4ZOW8ooI0VnVcD 7VXQqFsXPxre+eZ6g+G0AsmzdsG45C3qujUTRfGKqzYwXqjWjt9nNsdIy1Mrz8/4 zG1uLDkN0LXnBG2Te4q8ZckYwMq8gFXHHnH35RfQ5Besu6pvJmtK3rFXETdlP12A JjBh7t5jsCfzvYWFQehVp8mJupuftiOBPClmVh4vrvN9gYd5rzEgB4Q9Ioiqz2qT 2bE1zegR8NeOKBOi9xriTU8F530OdFzeWAbo7D5gyEbYdc60eNwbadcgNGLbzMg= =09T8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- View attachment "fix-__addr_ok-limit.patch" of type "text/plain" (1040 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.