Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:11:46 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE-request(?): squid: buffer overflow in Gopher
 reply parser

* [2011-08-29 13:48:17 +0200] Matthias Weckbecker wrote:

>Hi,
>
>squid 3.x seems to have re-introduced a security issue found by Ben Hawkes of
>the Google Security Team in 2005,
>
>  2011: http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2011_3.txt
>  2005: http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2005_1.txt (CVE-2005-0094)
>
>Will there be a new CVE required? Not quite sure how such "special" cases are
>handled usually.

Does anyone know when this was re-introduced?  The upstream advisory
indicates all 3.0 releases are affected, but doesn't indicate if 2.x
(after 2.5.STABLE7) was at any point vulnerable.

-- 
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.