Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:20:41 +0300
From: Eren Türkay <eren@...dus.org.tr>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Thomas Osterried <ax25@...erg.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: CVE request (and disclosure): ax25d missing
 setuid return code check

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> The AX.25 daemon (ax25d), typically provided in the ax25-tools
> package, allows administrators to associate incoming AX.25, NET/ROM,
> and ROSE traffic with the execution of an endpoint program (most
> commonly "node"), which is run under a specified user account.
> Because ax25d is missing a check on the return code for a setuid call
> responsible for dropping privileges to the specified user, it may be
> possible to cause setuid to fail, after which the chosen program will
> be executed with root privileges.  In other words, if you're in the
> business of handing out unprivileged shells over amateur radio (don't
> we all? :p ), this would allow for remote compromise.

Hello,

Thank you for your investigation on the topic. Although this issue seems
to be low-priority, it's good to let the maintainers know.

I'm CCing Ralf Baechle, and Thomas Osterried who, accordingly to
linux-ac25 site, are the maintainers of ax25 utilities.

> 
> -Dan

-- 
        . 73! DE TA1AET

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.