[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:40:01 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...r.be>
To: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: nbd-server
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:07:46AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
> * [2011-05-17 10:38:20 +0200] Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >In Debian the following was reported:
> >nbd-server 2.9.21 has a NULL-pointer dereference in its negotiation
> >phase, which allows unauthenticated users to DoS the server by causing
> >the negotiation to fail (e.g., by specifying a non-existing name for an
> >export).
> >
> >Filed as http://bugs.debian.org/627042. This affects only 2.9.21 so for us
> >goes that only our unstable distribution is affected.
> >
> >We'd like to have a CVE name for this.
>
> The Debian bug is really light on details, so here is the git commit
> that fixes this:
>
> http://nbd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=nbd/nbd;a=commitdiff;h=ebbbe0b3ce5393fa42a259f5e03d549508586aaa
>
> But I don't see any evidence that this _only_ affects 2.9.21. Are we
> sure that it doesn't affect earlier versions? The reporter doesn't
> indicate one way or the other.
Yes, absolutely; 2.9.21 and 2.9.21a (diff between .21 and .21a is a
documentation-related file that wasn't added to Makefile.am). The bug
was introduced with this commit:
http://nbd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=nbd/nbd;a=commit;h=9ea4e742ce6f1b7793d1edfca70427a8660aeffa
To be 100% sure, I just checked out the tree at the 2.9.20 tag and
recompiled; I couldn't reproduce it.
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:
pi zz a
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
