Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:10:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: "Mike O'Connor" <mjo@...o.mi.org>, coley <coley@...re.org> Subject: Re: CVE Request -- Cyrus-IMAP STARTTLS issue -- [was: Re: pure-ftpd STARTTLS command injection / new CVE?] Please use CVE-2011-1926. Thanks. -- JB ----- Original Message ----- > Hello, Josh, Steve, vendors, > > it was reported that Cyrus-IMAP is also prone to the CVE-2011-0411 > issue (in IMAP, LMTP, NNTP, POP3, .. protocols): >  http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3424 > > Relevant upstream patch: >  > http://git.cyrusimap.org/cyrus-imapd/patch/?id=523a91a5e86c8b9a27a138f04a3e3f2d8786f162 > > References: >  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705288 > > To my knowledge the list of CVE-2011-0411 related CVEs: > > CVE-2011-0411 Postfix > CVE-2011-1430 Ipswich IMAIL > CVE-2011-1431 1431 netqmail > CVE-2011-1432 SCO Soffice Server > CVE-2011-1575 pure-ftpd > > does not include Cyrus case yet (but not sure this list being > complete, so worthy of double-checking). > > Could you allocate a CVE id for this? > > Thank you & Regards, Jan. > -- > Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team > > On 04/11/2011 07:19 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote: > > :http://www.pureftpd.org/project/pure-ftpd/news > > : > > :states that pure-ftpd is affected by the same STARTTLS > > :injection bug as postifx's CVE-2011-0411. > > : > > :Is this CVE postfix-specific or can it be used for > > :pure-ftpd as well? If needed, can someone assign a new CVE? > > > > It should get its own CVE assignment. Other products with the > > same STARTTLS issue have gotten unique CVE assignments for them > > -- see CVE-2011-143. > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.