Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:30:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE Request: gif2png: command-line buffer overflow problem I'm typically uncomfortable assigning CVEs for such issues, since this makes the distinction between bugs and vulnerabilities even fuzzier than they already are, and potentially creates a "snowball effect" where suddenly CVE sets a precedent and inadvertently grants legitimacy to large numbers of issues that are of very little security concern to most consumers. However, when there are common usage scenarios in which the product is used that produce a vulnerability, these have been given CVEs in the past. (Non-exploitable browser crashers kind of fall under this reasoning, because of the common usage scenarios where (1) users will click on links, and (2) users will have multiple tabs/windows/sessions open, so a browser-ending crash will affect those sessions.) That's a long way of saying to use CVE-2009-5018 for this issue. - Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.