Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:29:26 -0600 From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Qt SSL endless loop * [2010-07-16 11:19:09 -0400] Josh Bressers wrote: >Please use CVE-2010-2533 Wasn't this already assigned CVE-2010-2621? http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2621 It links to the same advisory (qtsslame-adv.txt) and that only seems to be reporting one single problem. >----- "Ludwig Nussel" <ludwig.nussel@...e.de> wrote: > >> Raphael Geissert wrote: >> > [...] >> > He also reported another vulnerability in Qt4's SSL support: >> > http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/qtsslame-adv.txt >> > >> > (reported to the Debian maintainers in >> http://bugs.debian.org/587711) >> > >> > Could a CVE be assigned for this other issue too? >> >> Looks like the request got lost. >> >> The fix seems to be >> http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/commit/f7fe575bc5f628533aeeca3eb564af89a1a1426b >> >> According to the Mumble author this fix causes a regression with peer >> certificate validation when used with openssl >= 0.9.8n though: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4C3F8BC6.9030303%40natvig.com&forum_name=mumble-packaging >> http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-7200 -- Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.