Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:00:56 -0600 From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> Subject: Re: CVE request: ghostscript * [2010-07-12 12:48:35 -0400] Dan Rosenberg wrote: >I believe this is identical to CVE-2010-1869 >(http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-1869). They don't look identical to me. Patches differ, upstream bugs differ. Can't really do anything hands-on to test since the PoC attached to the upstream bug is private. >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Marc Deslauriers ><marc.deslauriers@...onical.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't think this ever got a CVE: >> >> A memory corruption vulnerability in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier caused >> by long names can lead to arbitrary code execution. >> >> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690523 >> http://svn.ghostscript.com/viewvc?view=rev&revision=9797 -- Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.