Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 01:54:35 -0500 From: Reed Loden <reed@...dloden.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Kurt Seifried <kurt@...fried.org> Subject: Re: Bugzilla 3.7.1 CVE request -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:51:40 -0600 Kurt Seifried <kurt@...fried.org> wrote: > CVE # for this please. > > http://www.bugzilla.org/security/3.7.1/ This security issue only affects the 3.7 and 3.7.1 development "snapshots" (basically, alpha/beta quality). It's highly unlikely that any distro would be tracking this unstable version/branch, so is a CVE really required? If so, Mozilla can assign one from its pool. I usually deal with getting CVEs assigned for Bugzilla issues, and I just didn't think this one required one... However, maybe I was mistaken in that. ~reed Mozilla Security Group - -- Reed Loden - <reed@...dloden.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkw0JKwACgkQa6IiJvPDPVrDPwCfax7OoqAr2Di+vZ0NQdXIrxZV pFMAoLBKcbef1hSrDiyeRUm7bTCoCmZY =EhY+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.