[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100707015435.b9cb8db8.reed@reedloden.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 01:54:35 -0500
From: Reed Loden <reed@...dloden.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Kurt Seifried <kurt@...fried.org>
Subject: Re: Bugzilla 3.7.1 CVE request
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:51:40 -0600
Kurt Seifried <kurt@...fried.org> wrote:
> CVE # for this please.
>
> http://www.bugzilla.org/security/3.7.1/
This security issue only affects the 3.7 and 3.7.1 development
"snapshots" (basically, alpha/beta quality). It's highly unlikely that
any distro would be tracking this unstable version/branch, so is a CVE
really required? If so, Mozilla can assign one from its pool.
I usually deal with getting CVEs assigned for Bugzilla issues, and I
just didn't think this one required one... However, maybe I was
mistaken in that.
~reed
Mozilla Security Group
- --
Reed Loden - <reed@...dloden.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkw0JKwACgkQa6IiJvPDPVrDPwCfax7OoqAr2Di+vZ0NQdXIrxZV
pFMAoLBKcbef1hSrDiyeRUm7bTCoCmZY
=EhY+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
