[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:31:57 +0100
From: Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de>
To: Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>
Cc: Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de>, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
coley <coley@...re.org>
Subject: Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw
Hey,
* Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com> [2010-02-05 22:48]:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:05:30 +0100
> Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de> wrote:
> > Hey,
> > * Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> [2010-02-05 20:11]:
> > > As many of you have probably seen, there was a supposed Samba 0day
> > > flaw posted to full-disclosure and youtube.
> > >
> > > Samba has a response to this:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126539387432412&w=2
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if this should get a CVE id. It is documented behavior.
> > > Somewhat unexpected though. I think changing the default is the
> > > right way to go, but it may be more of a hardening measure than a
> > > security fix.
> > >
> > > Thoughts Steve?
> >
> > Given the count of users that are probably affected by this and it
> > not being documented in e.g. man 5 smb.conf I'd vote for yes! :)
> >
> Sorry not clear what would not be documented in smb.conf ?
The wide_links variable, at least not in my copy.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@...ber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
