Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:21:01 +0800 From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com CC: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org> Subject: Re: CVE requests - kernel security regressions for CVE-2009-1385/and -1389 On 12/29/2009 10:12 AM, Eugene Teo wrote: > On 12/28/2009 03:47 PM, Eugene Teo wrote: >> http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/Fahrplan//events/3596.en.html >> >> In Fabian's talk, he describes two kernel NIC driver issues: >> >> Issue #1 >> Fabian claimed that CVE-2009-1385 has an incorrect fix: >> http://git.kernel.org/linus/ea30e11970a96cfe5e32c03a29332554573b4a10. > [...] >> Issue #2 >> The fix for CVE-2009-1389 regarding the r8169 driver introduces a >> similar security problem as this: >> http://git.kernel.org/linus/fdd7b4c3302c93f6833e338903ea77245eb510b4 is >> a revert of this: >> http://git.kernel.org/linus/126fa4b9ca5d9d7cb7d46f779ad3bd3631ca387c. > > Patches update can be found here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550907#c4 Issue #3 I noticed that the e1000e driver also needs a similar fix as issue #1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551214 Progress on the patches can be found in either of the two bugs. Thanks, Eugene -- Eugene Teo / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.