Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:30:54 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: coley@...re.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: XEmacs Multiple Integer Overflows

* [2009-08-05 13:53:50 +0200] Thomas Biege wrote:

>Hello,
>was a CVE-ID allocated for this issue in the meanwhile?

I don't believe so.  We've not seen one, at any rate.

>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I don't think we have a CVE for this/these issue(s) yet, so please
>> assign one/some:
>> 
>> The {tiff,png,jpeg}_instantiate() functions in glyphs-eimage.c contain
>> an integer overflow, possibly leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
>> 
>> References:
>> Filed upstream as: http://tracker.xemacs.org/XEmacs/its/issue534
>> 
>> http://secunia.com/advisories/35348
>> http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1666
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275397
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511994

-- 
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.