Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:56:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: oss-security CNA ----- "Mark J Cox" <mjc@...hat.com> wrote: > > So perhaps the solution is to have the vendor CNAs play more of a role on > the oss-security list in allocating and helping with content decisions > rather than having to have Mitre monitor the list. Then, each time a CNA > gives out a CVE on oss-security they could have some requirement of a > mimimum set of information about the allocation they have to provide in the > same mail. By having the CNA buffer we'd only have to involve Steve or > Mitre when something is complex. However, that would mean Mitre would have > to check oss-security list before allocating any CVE names for oss-issues > and accept there may be more duplicate allocations. > I've been thinking about this lately, it's likely a good idea. I think having an oss-security CNA that is not MITRE would be useful, and hopefully would alleviate some of the pressure MITRE currently feels. There would of course be collisions from time to time, but that's likely going to still cause less pain than the current model provides. If this idea is appealing to MITRE, we could start working out some of the details. -- JB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.