[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:30:33 -0500
From: "Michael K. Johnson" <johnsonm@...th.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: lxc-sshd security issues?
I have not received any response to this query upstream, and I
was wondering if anyone else has noticed this issue, and if so,
if they have any plans with regard to it. rPath isn't shipping
lxc at this point, so we have no plans for a security advisory.
But does pre-configured account information including root and
user passwords bother anyone else here?
----- Forwarded message from "Michael K. Johnson" <johnsonm@...th.com> -----
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:49:45 -0500
From: "Michael K. Johnson" <johnsonm@...th.com>
To: legoater@...e.fr
Subject: lxc-sshd security issues?
I'm guessing, from the contents of the tarball in lxc-sshd, that
you might be responsible for building lxc-sshd.
I noticed three potential security issues while briefly perusing
lxc-sshd:
o Pre-packaged host keys instead of generating unique host keys
within the script or optionally copying the host keys from
the system on which you are running lxc-sshd
o Pre-packaged root password instead of setting it in the script
o Pre-packaged legoater password ditto
Obviously, the pre-packaged passwords are a potential security
risk for you if you are using those passwords anywhere, and
could also be considered to be "back doors" if they actually
enable any access by default.
I haven't tested any of that -- it just seemed odd while
inspecting the tarball contents.
In addition, I noticed /root/.bash_history was packaged in the
tarball, which I am guessing was not intended.
----- End forwarded message -----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
