Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:25:20 +0100
From: Thomas Biege <>
Subject: Re: update on CVE-2008-5718

> > I am not very happy with the patch because it just filters a handful of
> > characters, a better solution would be to replace popen().
> > (I mentioned this on the netatalk-devel ML but got no answer so far.)
> It is no full shell escape but escapes everything that 
> should be relevant for command injection. Sure, replacing 
> the popen would be the better option but I was not too happy 
> doing this as I guess it's more likely to break existing 
> functionality with it by accident.

Yes, such a patch need to come from upstream.

 Thomas Biege <>, SUSE LINUX, Security Support & Auditing
 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
           Hamming's Motto:
           The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers.
                                -- Richard W. Hamming

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.