[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:42:33 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: steffen.joeris@...lelinux.de
Subject: Re: CVE id request: Clamav
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:41:27 +0200 Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:21:30 +1000 Steffen Joeris
> <steffen.joeris@...lelinux.de> wrote:
>
> > The upstream changelog says:
> > * libclamav/petite.c: fix possible invalid memory access (bb#1000)
> > Reported by Damian Put
>
> For the sake of CVE description completeness, I'm adding that it's
> from the clamav 0.93.1 changelog.
>
> Applied patch:
>
> http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/diff.php?repname=clamav-devel&path=/branches/0.93/libclamav/petite.c&rev=3886
Btw, following is mentioned in the 0.93.2 changelog:
Thu Jul 3 16:15:23 CEST 2008
-----------------------------
* libclamav/petite.c: fix another out of bounds memory read (bb#1000)
Reported by Secunia (CVE-2008-2713)
Referring to the same bug as before, which is now restricted (was it
publicly accessible before?).
The announcement mentions it too, but without specifying any
implications:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080707.155612.ad411b00.en.html
The fix does not even seem to be committed in the public clamav SVN
(either trunk or 0.93 branch).
Does anyone have more info? From commit message, it looks like DoS, so
probably worth new id for an incomplete fix.
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
