Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:23:51 +0200
From: Nico Golde <>
Subject: Re: CVE request for dnsmasq DoS

Hi Steven,
* Steven M. Christey <> [2008-07-02 00:05]:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> > There is a remote DoS in dnsmasq 2.25 (and presumably earlier) that is
> > fixed in 2.26. Details can be found at [1]. Can we get a CVE assigned
> > for this?
> I'm not sure I fully understand Thierry Carrez' comment about the security
> implications of this issue.  It seems like an exploit would require a
> malicious DHCP server, in which case isn't DHCP service already
> compromised?  If so, then a crash of dnsmasq (null dereference?) doesn't
> seem to be any worse than the loss of DHCP itself.

Why is a malicious DCHP server needed? As far as I 
understood the bug a client that doesn't already have a 
lease would just need to send a DHCPREQUEST to refresh its 
non-existant lease.
Nico Golde - - - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.