[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 18:54:44 +0200
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fake alert (?)
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 06:40:46PM +0200, Adam Zabrocki wrote:
> Yes, this is normal behaviour. It is nothing to do with LKRG, it just informs
> about *_JUMP_LABEL engine activities.
>
> We might change the default log_level from being WARN to ERR. In such case we
> won't see messages like that as well.
> However, I believe that default log_level=WARN is very well balanced. If
> someone don't want to see such messages, LKRG can be configured to use
> different log_level. It can be done from the beginning via module param.
I think we should keep the default log level as-is, but avoid logging
things that are normal as WARN. They're more reasonably called INFO.
Warning means that we think sometimes is likely wrong. That's not the
case for jump label modifications.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
