Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:59:11 +0000 From: Thomas Van Tongerloo <Thomas.VanTongerloo@...es.com> To: "lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com" <lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: LKRG Debian jessie Since the original question was related to Debian, I can confirm lkrg-main compiles and runs fine on Debian Stretch, tested this morning on: Linux XXX-DebianXX 4.9.0-5-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 (2018-01-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Xavier Sheperd [mailto:xavier.sheperd@....com] Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 8:44 PM To: lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [lkrg-users] LKRG Debian jessie On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +0100, Adam Zabrocki wrote: >> CentOS6: >> # uname -a >> Linux centos6 2.6.32-696.20.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 17:51:45 >> UTC 2018 >> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > >We are not supporting kernels 2.6. Ack. > >CentOS 7 with 3.10 kernel is easy to run - remove get_random_long() >declaration made by LKRG. This kernel backported patches with kernel declaration of it. > lkrg-main builds without errors, lkrg-experimental with 1 warning. Both load and run fine. >Thanks, >Adam Thank you for your help. Xavier P.S. I added the build logs, in case the details are useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.