![]() |
|
Message-ID: <be147208-ef53-44b8-8644-9f9048bb7e4f@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 09:48:13 -0300 From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org> To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> Cc: libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com, Sam James <sam@...too.org>, Schrodinger ZHU Yifan <i@...yi.fan> Subject: Re: vdso getrandom is slower than syscall on Zen5 On 25/07/25 09:28, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 2:27 PM Adhemerval Zanella Netto > <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org> wrote: >> >> 2. The vDSO symbol provided by the kernel has limited optimization >> compared to the one used internally on other Linux crypto subsystems. > > This is not true at all. The getrandom() syscall only ever uses the > slow generic C implementation and does not use any of the optimized > code. So I stand corrected.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.