Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:23:29 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: USB-FPGA development On 2016-11-09 23:11, Solar Designer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:13:51PM +0000, apingis@...nwall.net wrote: >> 2.3. I've implemented a warning when mask is too short and that results in performance degradation because USB 2.0 link has no enough bandwith. The warning appears during self-test and it looks confusing. How can format know when self-test is running, to suppress the warning? > > Oh, so this is why I saw that spurious warning. > > I think yes, you can detect self-test, but I'd rather someone else > (more familiar with jumbo specific) answers this. magnum, Jim? You can test for bench_running (declare it as extern volatile int). It will be true during self-test as well as benchmarking. >> Is it planned to add usage of mask in self-test? You can use '-test -mask' for benchmarking (optionally with a mask of choice), but it won't (yet) test/verify proper functionality (self tests are skipped). magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.