Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:08:47 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: spurious warning from generic crypt(3) format On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:53:51PM +0100, magnum wrote: > On 2016-02-29 20:48, Solar Designer wrote: > >Perhaps the code in loader.c that tries to delegate these hashes to the > >generic crypt(3) format should be disabled in jumbo when its own > >SHA-crypt formats are compiled in. Would you implement this logic? > > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/2069 > > Actually I can't think of any crypt(3) variant that we lack specific > support for now. Maybe Jumbo should simply never use the generic > crypt(3) (or even list it as an alternative) unless specifically requested? Yes, this is how it should be. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.