Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:45:14 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: hashcat rules (in)compatibility (was: Judy array) On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:17:09PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote: > Now we might want to introduce a new command character to do what > hashcat's 'x' does. What do we call it? 'h' or 'H' for hashcat? And > what would the other mean, then? (It's good to use lower/uppercase > command chars for something related or opposed.) Maybe 'e' for erase > (hashcat already defines 'E' for something else)? Any better idea? Another idea is to use 'm', for multi-character delete. We already use 'M' for memorize current word. Maybe it's better to reserve 'm' for something memory-related, or something else where this letter would be more essential. > There are also compatibility issues with 'L', 'R' (different syntax and > semantics: keyboard vs. bitwise shifts), '+' (we define it only for > single crack mode, though), and '*' (vs. Crack's use of this command). Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.