Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:53:20 -0700 From: Fred Wang <waffle.contest@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: larger bitmaps and hash tables On Sep 18, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > I would also like to give Fred a chance to contribute Judy before we > would have invested much time into a hash table rework. So adjusting > the bitmap sizes is fine to be done now, but changing how the bitmap and > hash table interact might be premature. I suspect that having a full > 32-bit partial hash easily available would be beneficial for possible > alternatives to hash tables as well. Fred, any comments on this? You are correct. There is no need for a hash table with Judy, and it will continue to offer long term benefits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.