Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:09:17 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: multi-threaded hash table initialization On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:18:41AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote: > OTOH, maybe the time savings will be greater on even bigger hash lists. I've just tried with 100M hashes (raw-md5 of numbers 0 to 99999999), and no. It's 1:18 on that machine either way. For the 29M, benchmarking just the loading now gives me a little over 21 seconds either way. Maybe there's an improvement from 21.7 to 21.3 or so, but that's very little. I think it's a failed experiment for now. I still think something like this can be done for a speedup, but not exactly this. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.