Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:40:03 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: ldr_split_line() performance regression On 2015-09-16 22:31, magnum wrote: > On 2015-09-16 22:25, Solar Designer wrote: >>>> We could also use strnlen() there, if we depend on it elsewhere in the >>>> jumbo tree anyway. >>> >>> Fully agree to that. If it must be used, then do it early, and use the >>> results. >> >> OK, I'll let you and magnum sort it out. >> >> In core, I won't currently commit a version with strnlen(), though. > > Just for the record, we don't exactly "depend" on strnlen in Jumbo. If > it's not available natively, we simply supply our own. We do just this > for a whole *lot* of little things now and most of it is in jumbo.[ch]. > I think/hope we are almost as portable as John Proper (in a few cases > actually more portable), except we more or less depend on gmake. BTW to complete that picture, we do still support "legacy Makefile" builds (checked/fixed now and then, mostly by Frank), but that means AC is out of the picture. So we won't have things like HAVE_STRNLEN and all bets are off. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.